Monday Market – Midnight Echoes #8 – June 30, 2012 (via @MidnightEchoMag)

Midnight Echo Magazine is accepting submissions for issue 8 until June 30, and there’s no specific theme other than ‘horror’ this time around (which I always find much more difficult to write, but hey):

The theme of Midnight Echo Issue 8 is knock our socks off with a damn good horror story! What do we mean by that? Well, we’re looking for stories that we might have trouble digesting. Stories that leave us feeling scared and excited about what’s in store… Scare us, shock us, freak us out, get up-close and personal with your imagination and startle us with the end result. We’re open to everything, but only the best will survive.

They want short fiction to 5000 words, and are paying AUD$0.03/word.

You can find the full submission details (including those for poetry and non-fiction) here: 
http://midnightechomagazine.com/submission-guidelines/

The Importance of Titles (via @catsparx @sircamaris)

Cat Sparks writes on David McDonald‘s blog about the importance of choosing a strong, poetic title for your story.

To me, it’s a bit like this: when you attend an important event, such as a wedding or dinner party, you dress accordingly and mostly that means smart clothes. To turn up in tracky pants and a dirty t-shirt is lazy, amongst other things. Boring titles are lazy. Writing is hard work. Why top off your efforts with something slack and half arsed?

I’ve mentioned this briefly in an older post, How To Stand Out in the Slush Pile, and Cat is absolutely right: a powerful title predisposes the reader, sets expectations. Obviously you want those to be as accurate as possible, to avoid disappointment. At the same time, you can use this to your advantage, if for example you want to lead the reader astray with a red herring. Careful not to annoy them though, especially if the reader is someone you want to convince to buy your submission.

Cat says:

If a slushpile story title is intriguing, I am automatically predisposed to want to like the story that comes with it. Maybe I won’t end up liking it after all, but isn’t positive anticipation an excellent place to start?

Read the original here:
http://www.davidmcdonaldspage.com/2012/04/cat-sparks/

A Collection of DRM-is-Dying News

It’s no secret that we don’t like DRM here at Literarium. It doesn’t prevent piracy, it imposes prohibitive costs on small publishers and it punishes honest customers. From this article, Note to Publishers: Your Addiction to DRM is Killing You:

When it comes to readers and book buyers, meanwhile, DRM has been nothing but a source of pain and frustration, just as it has been in every other content market, including digital music. Books from the Big Six can’t be loaned or borrowed, or they can only be loaned or borrowed a certain number of times. And they can only be used on one platform, with all kinds of restrictions. What these chains and locks do, more than anything else, is to make the simple act of buying and reading a digital book horrendously complicated. Does that make more people want to buy and read e-books? It’s hard to see how. In a very real sense, those locks are hobbling the industry.

Sure, this may not be visible to happy Kindle consumers, but since the Kindle explicitly refuses to accept the industry standard ePub format, which is how most independent and non-DRM eBooks are formatted, there is an automatic schism in the eBook world, where anyone selling an ePub only version of an ebook is unable to sell to Kindle users.

Similarly, innovation in the reading space, in particular social reading, is crippled because most new companies can’t offer their services to DRM-locked books, as shown in this article about our complicated relationship with eBooks:

Theoretically, it should be easy to share not just books, but passages we like, and there are a number of startups and services like OpenMargin and Readmill and Findings that are trying to make this happen. But competing rights, standards and platforms mean these kinds of features are available on only a tiny fraction of books, and that keeps most readers inside their little reading silos.

Add into the mix a recent article from an anonymous publishing executive, ‘Why I break DRM on e-books’. From that article:

I was coming to the conclusion that I wanted to start breaking DRM on e-books I bought so that I could read them on any e-reader, but what pushed me over the top was a terrific post from science-fiction author Charlie Stross, “Cutting their own throats.” He argues that DRM is a way for the Amazons of the world to create lock-in to their platforms.

Do click on Charlie Stross’s article in that quote above, by the way, and his follow up post to that, which relates directly to this news from TOR/Forge: Macmillan’s Tor/Forge goes DRM-free:

“Our authors and readers have been asking for this for a long time,” said Tor/Forge president and publisher Tom Doherty. “They’re a technically sophisticated bunch, and DRM is a constant annoyance to them. It prevents them from using legitimately-purchased e-books in perfectly legal ways, like moving them from one kind of e-reader to another.”

All these articles together provide a solid hope that DRM is finally going into the wastebasket of publishing tech history (as it has already done for music and as it will hopefully do in the future for video).

Note, authors concerned about piracy need to read this article by John Scalzi, to reassure themselves that the publishers are still putting energy into shutting down big distributors of pirated material. He quotes Patrick Nielsen Hayden, Senior Editor of Tor Books:

Just in case anyone is worried: I can tell you with complete confidence that Macmillan and Tor/Forge have no intention of scaling back our anti-piracy efforts in the e-book realm. We expect to continue working to minimize this problem with all the tools at our disposal.

This is as it should be: the publishers, authors and consumers on the same side. For too long, consumers have been lumped into the same bucket as commercial copyright violaters.

Science Fiction and Fantasy Creators Who Became Their Own Genres (via @io9 HT: @editormum75)

This is a fun article from io9, on authors who are/were so distinctive that they defined entire sections of genre fiction, in both film and on the page. I was interested to discover a few new names (am I too sheltered?) and to see a few classics left off the list (Lovecraft, Robert E. Howard, Tolkien):

Some people don’t just create new worlds and super-memorable characters — they give life to their own genres. There are some creators of fantastical stories whose work is so distinctive, you have a pretty good sense what’s going to happen when you pick up their work — and you’re excited, because it’s going to be a hell of a ride.

Have a look: 
http://io9.com/5902934/science-fiction-and-fantasy-creators-who-became-their-own-genres

Monday Market – Shimmer Magazine – Speculative Fiction

Shimmer Magazine has recently tripled its pay rate to 3 cents a word, and is increasing its size by 50%. This is great news for readers and writers alike. They are looking for:

Unusual and beautifully-written speculative fiction stories with full plots and strong characters. The best way to understand what we are looking for is to read an issue of the magazine. We’re most drawn to contemporary fantasy, and seek out stories with a strong emotional core. We like unusual stories with a fluid and distinctive voice, with specific and original images. Send us your odd unclassifiable stories–though we prefer traditional storytelling mechanics to experimental approaches.

They want short fiction up to 5000 words, so have a look (and read the magazine!) to see if it suits.

Find submission details here: 
http://www.shimmerzine.com/guidelines/fiction-guidelines/

Why You Can’t Find Indies in Bookstores (via @tglong)

Terri Guiliano Long gives her perspective on the distribution of independent publishers’ books:

In 2011, Barbara Freethy, a #1 New York Times bestselling author of thirty novels, began self-publishing her backlist. Freethy has sold an amazing 1.5 million books. While she’s currently in talks with distributors, bookstores do not yet stock her self-published titles. It may be tempting to chalk it up to a conspiracy to marginalize indie books—conspiracy theories are fun! In reality, it comes down to dollars and cents.

Terri breaks down some of the barriers to successful distribution, and outlines some hope for the future:

Barbara Freethy is currently exploring her print distribution options. “This is a huge untapped market,” Freethy says. “I personally have many, many readers clamoring for my books to come out in print . . . [now] if they don’t have an electronic reader, they’re out of luck.”

This is quite a lengthy article, and there are some great examples of agents and publishers (and authors) working within the confines of the existing system to get their books out there.

Check it out here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/11/why-you-cant-find-indies-in-bookstores_n_1418839.html

Monday Market – The Text Prize for YA and Children’s Writing – 1 June 2012 (via @abbeysbookshop)

The Text Prize is an annual prize (est. 2008) for unpublished manuscripts in the YA and Children’s categories, and is opening on April 30 for submissions through to Friday, June 1, 2012:

Both published and unpublished writers of all ages are eligible to enter with works of fiction or non-fiction. Judged by a panel of editors from Text Publishing, the winner will receive a publishing contract with Text and a $10,000 advance against royalties.

Note this is for manuscripts of at least $25,000, for Australian and New Zealand permanent residents.

You can find the full submission details here:
http://textpublishing.com.au/static/files/assets/7dd4cad5/TextPrizeEntryForm2012.pdf

The Dangle: A promise of rewards in the future for work performed now (via @ritholtz)

This post doesn’t relate directly to writing, but it can be related directly to writing, and I am doing so now.

‘The Dangle’ is Barry Ritholtz‘s term for something we as writers would already be quite familiar with: working for free, or more aptly, for the promise of exposure:

In the present discussion, consider these various dangles made by content factories to me over the years:

1) You will get traffic back from the content site;
2) You’re building an audience;
3) You are enhancing your own personal brand;
4) You will raise your Google Page Rank
5) You are developing a reputation

Barry discusses this in general terms, but with the proliferation of the euphemistic ‘For the Love’ antho and ‘royalty only’ anthologies (which the author Alan Baxter lambasted here), I thought it was an appropriate read for fiction writers, who are often desperate (and therefore vulnerable to exploitation).

Read it all here (it’ll make you famous!):
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/02/the-dangle/